ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Evaluation of Net Withdrawal Time and Colonoscopy Video Summarization Using Deep Learning Based Automated Temporal Video Segmentation.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adequate withdrawal time is crucial in colonoscopy, as it is directly associated with polyp detection rates. However, traditional withdrawal time measurements can be biased by non-observation activities, leading to inaccurate assessments of procedural quality. This study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) model that accurately measures net withdrawal time by excluding non-observation phases and generates quantitative visual summaries of key procedural events. We developed a DL-based automated temporal video segmentation model trained on 40 full-length colonoscopy videos and 825 cecum clips extracted from 221 colonoscopy procedures. The model classifies four key events: cecum, intervention, outside, and narrow-band imaging (NBI) mode. Using the temporal video segmentation results, we calculated the net withdrawal time and extracted representative images from each segment for video summarization. Model performance was evaluated using four standard temporal video segmentation metrics, and its correlation with endoscopist-recorded times on both internal and external test datasets. In both internal and external tests, the DL model achieved a total F1 score exceeding 93% for temporal video segmentation performance. The net withdrawal time showed a strong correlation with endoscopist-recorded times (internal dataset, r = 0.984, p < 0.000; external dataset, r = 0.971, p < 0.000). Additionally, the model successfully generated representative images, and the endoscopists' visual assessment confirmed that these images provided accurate summaries of key events. Compared to manual review, the proposed model offers a more efficient, standardized and objective approach to assessing procedural quality. This model has the potential to enhance clinical practice and improve quality assurance in colonoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.