ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
Novel nonbiological surgical sealant to control air leakage after lung resection.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPulmonary air leakage is a major complication in patients undergoing lung resection, particularly with the increasing use of segmentectomy in Japan. We developed a non-biological polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel sealant to control pulmonary air leakage. This study compared the adhesiveness, expansion, and safety of PEG hydrogel with those of fibrin glue.
methodsAdhesiveness was evaluated using isolated ventilated pig lungs subjected to a stepwise increase in airway pressure. A pleural defect was created, and PEG hydrogels with elastic moduli (G') = 38.2, 646, 3900, and 7780 Pa were applied alongside fibrin glue with G' = 7260 Pa. PEG hydrogel with G' = 7780 Pa and fibrin glue were also applied to isolated deflated pig lungs, which were then inflated to assess expandability. Additionally, a pleural defect was created in rat lungs, and PEG hydrogel or fibrin glue was applied. The rats were observed for 2 and 4 weeks to evaluate safety.
resultsNo air leakage was observed in pig lungs treated with PEG hydrogel with G' = 7780 Pa. In contrast, air leakage occurred with PEG hydrogels of other stiffnesses and fibrin glue. PEG hydrogel with G' = 7780 Pa exhibited strong adherence to the pleural surface compared to fibrin glue following lung expansion. All rats survived, and the PEG hydrogel remained intact without peeling at 2 and 4 weeks.
conclusionThe PEG hydrogel is entirely non-biological and poses no infection risk. It demonstrates potential advantages over fibrin glue in preventing postoperative air leakage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40762924What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.