ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2025
An attention-based fuzzy CNN-LTSM network for visual object recognition from fMRI images.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Decoding visual stimuli is an increasing challenge in the field of neuroscience. It is hoped to classify the patterns of brain activity that occur when people look at visual stimuli. This paper introduces a new method for detecting visual objects from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data using an attention-guided convolutional neural network (CNN) with a long short-term memory (LSTM) model. The new model is end-to-end trained for visual object recognition. In CNNs, the method proposed receives frequency and spatial information, whereas the LSTM network learns temporal features. But the fully connected network and a fuzzy neural block (FNB) are included to examine the classification results. The method is verified through performance using the DS105, DS107, and DS116 databases, and two approaches of hyperparameter tuning, Bayesian optimization and the coordinate descent algorithm, are compared. The introduced architecture, an FNB, utilizing Bayesian optimization to tune shows more than 97% recognition accuracy rates on all databases, demonstrating superior classification accuracy to the state of the literature. The superior performance of the proposed model along with fuzzy units’ generalizability to other classifiers suggests promising enhancements for visual object recognition from fMRI data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40762900What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.