ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Exploring the interplay between LDHA and ABCC1 in breast cancer using computational approach.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bis-(di-4-phenyl-benzylaminethiocarbonyl)disulfide sensitizes ABCC2/ALDH3A1 overexpressing NSCLC cells to cisplatin.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrug resistance is the major cause of the high death rates in Breast cancer (BC), which continues to be the most frequent disease among women. Chemoresistance is significantly mediated by drug efflux transporters, including ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCC1, and glycolytic enzymes, especially lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA). Improving treatment results requires an understanding of the expression patterns, genetic changes, and prognostic importance of ABCC1 and LDHA.
objectiveThis study aims to elucidate the role of LDHA and ABCC1 in BC prognosis, tumor progression, and treatment resistance using integrated bioinformatics and in-silico approaches. METHODOLOGY: To investigate the expression and correlation between LDHA and ABCC1, in-silico analysis was done using a range of bioinformatics tools, such as UALCAN, TIMER 2.0, Bc GeneExminer, DISCO, and others, were used. GeneMANIA and STRING databases were used to explore gene–gene and protein–protein interaction networks, while KM Plotter evaluated survival correlations. Functional enrichment and pathway analyses were conducted using Enrichr for Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG pathways. For therapeutic targeting, structure-based molecular docking was performed using AutoDock Vina, where selected anticancer compounds were docked against LDHA and ABCC1 to identify potential inhibitors.
resultsOur research indicates that the expression levels of LDHA and ABCC1 are elevated in several malignancies including Breast Cancer. The elevated expression levels of LDHA and ABCC1 significantly correlate with worse overall survival. Expression analysis of ENO1 (Enolase 1) and ESR1 (Estrogen Receptor 1) genes in relation to LDHA and ABCC1 mutations in Breast Cancer samples revealed that higher ENO1 expression is observed in mutant samples, while ESR1 expression is significantly reduced, suggesting an association with altered metabolic and hormonal pathways. Furthermore, NHI-2 and Sulfinpyrazone were found as the potential chemical that targets LDHA and ABCC1 through in-silico studies.
conclusionThis study highlights the oncogenic significance of LDHA and ABCC1 in Breast Cancer progression and therapy resistance. The in-silico identification of NHI-2 and sulfinpyrazone as potential inhibitors supports a novel dual-targeting strategy to simultaneously disrupt metabolic and drug efflux pathways, which could enhance therapeutic efficacy and overcome resistance in Breast Cancer. Further experimental validation is warranted to confirm these findings and facilitate clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.