ReviewNeuropsychology review2025
Characterising Long-Term Depressive Symptoms Post-brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Symptom Trajectory Groups and Their Predictors.
Review in Neuropsychology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baseline PTSD and depressive symptoms predict multidimensional recovery after combat-related transtibial amputation: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Person-Centered Approaches for Identifying Subgroups of Post-Stroke Depression: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review investigates the long-term trajectories of depressive symptoms in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) and identifies factors predicting group membership in these trajectories. The review follows the PRISMA guidelines and is registered on the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY-2023-11-0013). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, EMBASE, CINHALPlus, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science identified peer-reviewed studies published in English on adults aged 16 and above with an ABI diagnosis. Studies were included if they used a validated depression measure, had at least three assessment points, and applied group-based trajectory modelling. Exclusion criteria included studies focusing on neurodegenerative or neurodevelopmental disorders, or solely on treatments. The methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs' critical appraisal tool. The review synthesised data from ten studies involving 13,205 participants (average age 51.38 years, 55.86% male). Four depressive symptom trajectory groups were identified with varying prevalence: stable low (68%), persistent high (13%), increasing (20%), and decreasing (11%). Several key predictors including sex, age, injury severity, and education emerged as significant predictors of group membership in the persistent high, increasing, and decreasing depressive groups. However, variability in study methodologies and sample compositions posed challenges to direct comparison. Nonetheless, the review underscores the importance of long-term monitoring and the development of tailored interventions, as depression can manifest or intensify years post-injury. Understanding depressive symptom trajectories could help create personalised interventions, improving quality of life for those with depression after ABI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40762886What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.