Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40762846›Full record

ArticleRadiology2025

MRI-based Ovarian Lesion Classification via a Foundation Segmentation Model and Multimodal Analysis: A Multicenter Study.

Wen-Chi Hsu, Yuli Wang, Yu-Fu Wu, Ruohua Chen, Shadi Afyouni, Jhehong Liu, Somasundaram Vin, Victoria Shi, Maliha Imami, Jill S Chotiyanonta and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Wen-Chi Hsu *Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.ORCID 0000-0002-8303-4382
Yuli Wang *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.
Yu-Fu WuDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, No. 5 Fuxing St, Guishan Dist, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0176-2579
Ruohua ChenDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.ORCID 0009-0007-9944-4320
Shadi AfyouniDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Jhehong LiuDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, No. 5 Fuxing St, Guishan Dist, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0007-0550-2279
Somasundaram VinDepartment of Radiology, Brown University Health, Providence, RI.
Victoria ShiJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.ORCID 0000-0002-5235-2425
Maliha ImamiDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Jill S ChotiyanontaDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.ORCID 0009-0008-6395-5222
Ghazal ZandiehDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.ORCID 0009-0002-0253-923X
Yeyu CaiDepartment of Radiology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3784-7400
Jeffrey P LealDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.ORCID 0000-0002-8774-4541
Kenichi OishiDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.ORCID 0000-0002-1200-8611
Atif ZaheerDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.ORCID 0000-0002-4824-6654
Robert C WardDepartment of Radiology, Brown University Health, Providence, RI.ORCID 0000-0002-4594-6460
Paul J L ZhangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Jing WuDepartment of Radiology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Zhicheng JiaoDepartment of Radiology, Brown University Health, Providence, RI.
Ihab R KamelDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo.
Gigin Lin *Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, No. 5 Fuxing St, Guishan Dist, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-1058
Harrison X Bai *Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ALAN KEITH MEEKER · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Precision Medicine for Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: Combined Neuroimaging Clinical Approach to Link Phenotypes to PrognosisR01NS126549 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Kenichi Oishi · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS126549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence may enhance diagnostic accuracy in classifying ovarian lesions on MRI scans; however, its applicability across diverse datasets is uncertain. Purpose To develop an efficient, generalizable pipeline for MRI-based ovarian lesion characterization. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, multiparametric MRI datasets of patients with ovarian lesions from a primary institution (January 2008 to January 2019) and two external institutions (January 2010 to October 2020) were analyzed. Lesions were automatically segmented using Meta's Segment Anything Model (SAM). A DenseNet-121 deep learning (DL) model incorporating both imaging and clinical data was then trained and validated externally for ovarian lesion classification. Lesions were evaluated by radiologists using the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for MRI and subjective assessment, classifying them as benign or malignant. The classification performances of the DL model and radiologists were compared using the DeLong test. Results The primary dataset included 534 lesions from 448 women (mean age, 52 years ± 15 [SD]) from institution A (United States), whereas the external datasets included 58 lesions from 55 women (mean age, 51 years ± 19) from institution B (United States) and 29 lesions from 29 women (mean age, 49 years ± 10) from institution C (Taiwan). SAM-assisted segmentation had a Dice coefficient of 0.86-0.88, reducing the processing time per lesion by 4 minutes compared with manual segmentation. The DL classification model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.85) on the internal test and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.79 and 0.78, 0.79) across both external datasets with SAM-segmented images, comparable with the radiologists' performance (AUC: 0.84-0.93; all

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvaryRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40762846
PMCPMC12405730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.