ArticleRadiology2025
MRI-based Ovarian Lesion Classification via a Foundation Segmentation Model and Multimodal Analysis: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative prediction of positive surgical margins in prostate cancer using multimodal deep learning model: a multicenter study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Multi-Modal Ultrasound-Based Prognostic Model for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Predominantly Superficial Lymph Node Involvement.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrating large language models for enhanced predictive analytics in healthcare.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Role of Imaging Techniques in Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis: Current Approaches and Future Directions.Cancers · 2026Review
- Interpretable hybrid deep learning features of pectoralis on low-dose chest CT for detecting type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence may enhance diagnostic accuracy in classifying ovarian lesions on MRI scans; however, its applicability across diverse datasets is uncertain. Purpose To develop an efficient, generalizable pipeline for MRI-based ovarian lesion characterization. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, multiparametric MRI datasets of patients with ovarian lesions from a primary institution (January 2008 to January 2019) and two external institutions (January 2010 to October 2020) were analyzed. Lesions were automatically segmented using Meta's Segment Anything Model (SAM). A DenseNet-121 deep learning (DL) model incorporating both imaging and clinical data was then trained and validated externally for ovarian lesion classification. Lesions were evaluated by radiologists using the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for MRI and subjective assessment, classifying them as benign or malignant. The classification performances of the DL model and radiologists were compared using the DeLong test. Results The primary dataset included 534 lesions from 448 women (mean age, 52 years ± 15 [SD]) from institution A (United States), whereas the external datasets included 58 lesions from 55 women (mean age, 51 years ± 19) from institution B (United States) and 29 lesions from 29 women (mean age, 49 years ± 10) from institution C (Taiwan). SAM-assisted segmentation had a Dice coefficient of 0.86-0.88, reducing the processing time per lesion by 4 minutes compared with manual segmentation. The DL classification model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.85) on the internal test and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.79 and 0.78, 0.79) across both external datasets with SAM-segmented images, comparable with the radiologists' performance (AUC: 0.84-0.93; all
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.