ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Diagnostic challenges in vestibular migraine-clinical differentiation from Menière's disease and discrepancies with current classification criteria.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dopaminergic Dysregulation in Migraine: From Hypothalamic A11 Dysfunction to a Systemic Biobehavioral Phenotype.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Conversational Large Language Models for Vestibular Diagnosis in Outpatient Clinics: Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Causal cross-trait mapping at single-cell resolution identifies shared immunogenetic drivers of migraine and Meniere's disease.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Patient-Level Modeling of Ménière's Disease vs. Vestibular Migraine: Performance of Speech Discrimination and Caloric-vHIT Dissociation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Tinnitus: well known in antiquity, highly relevant today.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Vestibular migraine. Clinical and diagnostic challenges, and emerging therapeutic approaches.Current opinion in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVestibular migraine (VM) and Menière's disease (MD) are spontaneous episodic vestibular syndromes and often present with overlapping features, making clinical differentiation challenging. This study aimed to (1) identify key features distinguishing VM from MD and (2) investigate discrepancies between expert diagnosis and International Classification of Vestibular Disorders (ICVD) criteria for VM.
methodsWe analyzed data from patients diagnosed with VM or MD at the tertiary dizziness center of LMU Munich. Diagnostic classification was based on ICVD criteria and expert judgment. Symptoms, vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) function, and demographics were compared. A conditional inference tree identified key differentiators. For 'suspected VM' cases not meeting ICVD criteria, reasons for diagnostic discrepancy were analyzed.
resultsWe included 290 patients: 188 with VM and 88 with MD. VM was more common in women (72% vs. 51%) and had an earlier onset (39.6 vs. 49.9 years). MD patients had more rotational vertigo, greater caloric asymmetry, and lower VOR gains on video head impulse testing (all p < 0.0001). The tree identified seven key variables and achieved 86% accuracy. Sixty-six VM patients were diagnosed as 'suspected VM' based on expert judgment. Discrepancies were primarily due to short attack duration and atypical symptoms.
conclusionsThis study identified seven clinical variables to effectively distinguish VM from MD. While VM and MD share overlapping features, diagnostic ambiguity remains common, particularly in cases not meeting ICVD criteria. Our findings support the introduction of a 'suspected VM' category to capture patients with atypical presentations not covered by ICVD criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.