SynthesisGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
Efficacy and clinical outcomes of suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide in diabetic macular edema patients: a single-arm systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide (SCTA) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). The study was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, involving a comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed to identify relevant studies assessing SCTA in DME, and data from selected studies were pooled for analysis. The primary outcomes were changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Secondary outcome was the duration of therapeutic effect, intraocular pressure (IOP) and other complications. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled mean with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eleven studies were included, comprising a total sample size of 411 eyes. In patients with DME receiving SCTA, CMT significantly improved over the study period (SMD: -5.377, 95% CI: -7.290 to -3.464, P = 0.000), decreasing from a pooled mean of 545.313 μm at baseline to 315.794 μm at last follow-up post-injection. CDVA improved from a baseline value of 0.777 to 0.521 LogMAR at final follow-up but failed to demonstrate statistical significance (SMD: 1.083, 95% CI: -0.520 to 2.686, P = 0.185). Additionally, the therapeutic effect of SCTA was shown to last up to 6 to 12 months in several studies. Post-injection IOP remained stable (SMD: 0.428, 95% CI: -0.324 to 1.179, P = 0.264). Other complications included cataract progression, particularly in phakic patients, while retinal detachment and endophthalmitis were rare. In conclusion, SCTA intervention in DME patients demonstrated a significant improvement in CMT along with stable CDVA and IOP. The absence of IOP elevation is a key advantage, making SCTA an effective and safe treatment option with favorable structural and visual outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40762816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.