Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40762815›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025

Clinical features and classification framework of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in Saudi populations.

Wael A Alsakran, Adhwa Abdullah Alsadoon, Bena Alsayed, Moustafa S Magliyah, Hani Basher ALBalawi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wael A AlsakranVitreoretinal Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Adhwa Abdullah AlsadoonVitreoretinal Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Bena AlsayedOphthalmology Department, King Fahad University, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Al Khobar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Moustafa S MagliyahVitreoretinal Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Hani Basher ALBalawiOphthalmology Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. hb.albalawi@ut.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Changes in visual acuity(VA) can be caused by polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy(PCV), a subtype of macular neovascularization which is characterized by the formation of polyp-like structures under the retinal pigment epithelium. PCV has been commonly found concurrent with the neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), which has led to the debate regarding whether, it should be viewed as an independent entity or as a subset of nAMD. The insight into the clinical features of PCV and its therapeutic response such as understanding the prognosis of this disease is very crucial for management and better outcomes. This study aims to differentiate the different types of PCV, and assess its clinical features, disease progression, and treatment options available for Saudi patients and also examine the effectiveness of different treatment modalities. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective study was conducted in Saudi Arabia among 39 PCV diagnosed patients, using multimodal imaging technique for assessment such as fundus imaging, OCT and ICGA. Patients were classified into three subtypes: age-related macular degeneration-associated PCV(PCV-AMD, Type A), a group with posterior-capsule-vitreous neovascularization-associated PCV (PCV-BVN, Type B), and idiopathic PCV (Type C). The treatment options available were photodynamic therapy(PDT), thermal laser therapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. The clinical and visual outcomes were evaluated at the end of 1 year. SPSS version 23 was used to conduct statistical analysis, including chi-square, ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p < 0.05).

resultsPCV-AMD was the most common subtype(75.7%), followed by PCV-BVN (13.5%) and idiopathic PCV (10.8%). The median age was 68 years, with idiopathic PCV patients being significantly younger (p = 0.012). Most lesions were macular (94.6%) with peaked/dome-shaped RPE elevations (94.6%). Anti-VEGF therapy was administered in 94.6% of cases, with aflibercept usage differing significantly across subtypes (p = 0.018). Complete lesion resolution was achieved in 45.9%, with PCV-BVN showing the highest resolution rate (80%) and idiopathic PCV the lowest at(0%).

conclusionPCV is predominantly presents as a variant of nAMD, with significant differences in subtype characteristics and treatment response. While anti-VEGF therapy remains the mainstay of treatment, idiopathic PCV appears more refractory, necessitating the individualized therapeutic strategies. Additional future studies are required to enhance management strategies for this condition.

Indexed as

ChoroidChoroidal NeovascularizationPolypsVisual AcuityAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotochemotherapyPolypoidal Choroidal VasculopathyRetrospective StudiesAngiogenesis InhibitorsAge-related macular degenerationAnti-VEGF therapyMultimodal imagingPolypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.