ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Prognostic Role of Mesoappendiceal Invasion and Implications for Recommending Right Hemicolectomy versus Simple Appendectomy.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ASO Author Reflections: Isolated Mesoappendiceal Invasion Is Not an Indication for Right Hemicolectomy in Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidelines are conflicting as to whether mesoappendiceal invasion (MAI) among patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (aNETs) warrants right hemicolectomy (RHC), especially in the absence of other concomitant high-risk features.
methodsPatients who underwent resection of aNETs were identified in the National Cancer Database. Patients with pT3 aNETs (i.e. size > 4 cm or MAI/subserosal invasion [SI]+) were further stratified as pT3a (size ≤ 4 cm, + MAI/SI) or pT3b (size > 4 cm, ± MAI/SI). The association of MAI/SI with nodal metastasis (pN+) relative to the presence/absence of other risk factors was examined. The prognostic impact of the extent of resection (i.e. RHC vs. appendectomy) among patients with MAI/SI was assessed.
resultsAmong 4819 patients who underwent resection for aNETs, 1662 had pT3 tumors, of which 1309 (78.7%) were pT3a and 353 (21.3%) were pT3b. The overall incidence of pN+ disease was 7.5%, and varied by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pT stage (pT1: 0.9%; pT2: 9.2%; pT3: 8.5%; pT4: 29.8%; p < 0.001). pT3a stage was less frequently associated with pN+ disease compared with pT3b disease (6.8% vs. 14.7%; p = 0.02). In the absence of other established risk factors, the presence of MAI/SI alone was associated with a low probability of pN+ (3.4%). The 3-year overall survival among patients with pT3a aNETs was comparable following RHC versus simple appendectomy (92.7% vs. 95.2%; p = 0.43).
conclusionsAmong patients with resected aNETs, MAI/SI alone in the absence of other established risk factors was associated with a low likelihood of nodal metastasis and equivalent long-term outcomes regardless of the extent of surgical resection. The presence of MAI/SI alone should not be an indication for RHC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.