Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40762750›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2025

Across the Bettor-Verse: an Open Banking Perspective on Gambling in the United Kingdom.

Kasra Ghaharian, Jay Peterson, Mana Azizsoltani, Richard J Young, Eric R Louderback

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kasra GhaharianInternational Gaming Institute, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA. kasra.ghaharian@unlv.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4238-0278
Jay PetersonWilliam F. Harrah College of Hospitality, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0133-2275
Mana AzizsoltaniInternational Gaming Institute, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5193-2823
Richard J YoungInternational Gaming Institute, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1109-7552
Eric R LouderbackChestnut Hill Analytics Insights, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9754-9790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open banking provides an opportunity to leverage bank transaction data to support gambling harm prevention by providing an objective and comprehensive view of individuals' gambling activities. In this study, we present a large-scale descriptive analysis of gambling transaction activity from an open banking dataset, representing a sample of 1,030,788 users of a credit scoring service in the UK for 2022. The median gambler (n = 650,502) transacted with 2 merchants, made 14 deposits, had a typical debit of £10.00, a net loss of £95.00, and deposited 0.53% of income. Consistent with prior gambling literature, our analyses revealed small groups of gamblers (i.e., about 3%) who displayed disproportionately higher gambling activity based on their frequency of debits, total amount debited, and net loss. Males and younger people were more likely to fall into these high-involvement groups, and group members transacted with significantly more gambling merchants (5 to 6 merchants vs. the median of 2). This study establishes a baseline census of gambling activity from open banking data, offering insights to inform researchers and policymakers about opportunities for harm prevention.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveCommerceGamblingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited KingdomYoung AdultGamblingGambling harmOpen bankingTransaction data

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.