Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40762727›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Beyond the heart: prevalence and implications of extra-coronary findings in coronary CT angiography: a retrospective study.

David A Gloor, Inga Todorski, Alan Peters, Benedikt Wagner, Tobias Gassenmaier, Justus Roos, Andreas Christe, Lukas Ebner, Adrian T Huber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David A GloorDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Inga TodorskiDepartment of Radiology, Octorad AG, Hirslanden, Zürich, Switzerland.
Alan PetersDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Benedikt WagnerDepartment of Radiology, Linde Hospital, Hirslanden Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Tobias GassenmaierDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Luzerner Kantonsspital, University Teaching and Research Hospital, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Justus RoosDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Luzerner Kantonsspital, University Teaching and Research Hospital, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Andreas ChristeDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Lukas EbnerDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Adrian T HuberDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Adrian.huber@luks.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6146-8238

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 10003604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the prevalence and clinical implications of extra-coronary findings in a large cohort of patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from 3295 consecutive CCTA examinations at a single tertiary center. Radiology reports were reviewed for potentially significant extra-coronary findings. Three-year follow-up evaluation was performed via hospital records. Prevalences of confirmed significant findings were determined and extrapolated to patients lost to follow-up.

resultsExtra-coronary findings were reported in 92.7% (3053/3295) of patients. Potentially significant non-cardiovascular findings were found in 25.3% (833/3295), including potentially malignant findings in 8.5% (281/3295) and significant non-malignant findings in 19.3% (637/3295). Among patients with potentially malignant findings, 40.2% (113/281) underwent follow-up, with confirmed malignancy in 28.3% (32/113). Extrapolation suggests a malignancy prevalence of up to 2.4% (95% CI: 1.8-3.2%) within the CCTA field of view, with a minimum of 1.0% if all patients lost to follow-up were assumed to have no malignancy. The most frequent significant non-malignant finding was pulmonary emphysema (10.7%; 352/3295), with extrapolated prevalence rates of 4.2% (95% CI: 2.6-5.9% for COPD and 1.8% (95% CI: 0.8-3.4%) for asthma or obstructive sleep apnea. Liver steatosis was present in 4.5% (147/3295), with an estimated prevalence of 3.1% (95% CI: 1.6-4.2%) for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and 1.3% (95% CI: 0.3-2.9%) for alcohol-related liver disease.

conclusionExtra-coronary findings are common in CCTA and carry important clinical implications. Careful management is necessary, and additional screening protocols may benefit high-risk patients. KEY POINTS: Question How frequently do extra-coronary findings occur in coronary CT angiography, and what is their clinical impact in patients undergoing cardiac evaluation? Findings Clinically significant extra-coronary non-cardiovascular findings were identified in 25.3% of patients, including unsuspected malignancies and relevant pulmonary and hepatic comorbidities. Clinical relevance Extra-coronary findings on coronary CT angiography are common and often clinically relevant, warranting structured assessment to support timely diagnosis and multidisciplinary patient care.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyIncidental FindingsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesCoronary vesselsIncidental findingsNeoplasmsPulmonary diseaseTomography (X-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID40762727
PMCPMC12953475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.