Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40762719›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2025

Topological classification of tumour-immune interactions and dynamics.

Jingjie Yang, Heidi Fang, Jagdeep Dhesi, Iris H R Yoon, Joshua A Bull, Helen M Byrne, Heather A Harrington, Gillian Grindstaff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advancing Precision Medicine: Algebraic Topology and Differential Geometry in Radiology and Computational Pathology.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jingjie YangMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Heidi FangMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Jagdeep DhesiMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Iris H R YoonWesleyan University, Middletown, CT, 06459, USA.
Joshua A BullMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Helen M ByrneLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Heather A HarringtonMax Planck Institute Center for Systems Biology, Dresden, Germany.
Gillian GrindstaffMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK. grindstaff@maths.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3993-1510

Funding

Cancer Research UK CTRQQR-2021\100002Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R005125/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R018472/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/T001968/1National Science Foundation MSPRF 2202895Royal Society RGF\EA\201074Royal Society UF150238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex and dynamic crosstalk between tumour and immune cells results in tumours that can exhibit distinct qualitative behaviours-elimination, equilibrium, and escape-and intricate spatial patterns, yet share similar cell configurations in the early stages. We offer a topological approach to analyse time series of spatial data of cell locations (including tumour cells and macrophages) in order to predict malignant behaviour. We propose four topological vectorisations specialised to such cell data: persistence images of Vietoris-Rips and radial filtrations at static time points, and persistence images for zigzag filtrations and persistence vineyards varying in time. To demonstrate the approach, synthetic data are generated from an agent-based model with varying parameters. We compare the performance of topological summaries in predicting-with logistic regression at various time steps-whether tumour niches surrounding blood vessels are present at the end of the simulation, as a proxy for metastasis (i.e., tumour escape). We find that both static and time-dependent methods accurately identify perivascular niche formation, significantly earlier than simpler markers such as the number of tumour cells and the macrophage phenotype ratio. We find additionally that dimension 0 persistence applied to macrophage data, representing multi-scale clusters of the spatial arrangement of macrophages, performs best at this classification task at early time steps, prior to full tumour development, and performs even better when time-dependent data are included; in contrast, topological measures capturing the shape of the tumour, such as tortuosity and punctures in the cell arrangement, perform best at intermediate and later stages. We analyse the logistic regression coefficients for each method to identify detailed shape differences between the classes.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, ImmunologicalNeoplasmsAnimalsCell CommunicationComputer SimulationHumansLogistic ModelsMacrophagesMathematical ConceptsNeoplasm MetastasisTumor EscapeTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40762719
PMCPMC12325540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.