ArticleEnvironmental management2025
The Effect of Dominant Land-Cover Transitions in Shaping Trajectories of Global Forest Change.
Article in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Land-cover transitions from forest to non-forest land-covers have led to substantial loss and fragmentation of global forests. While average rates of forest change are well studied, less attention has been paid to spatio-temporal trajectories of forest loss and recovery. These trajectories likely differ by land-cover transition types, and may be constrained by the initial amount and spatial arrangement of the non-forest land-cover. In this study, we distinguish between abrupt and gradual forest change trajectories, evaluating how they vary across land-cover transitions and how initial non-forest land-cover conditions mediate the amount and rate of forest change. To this end, we use annual global land-cover maps (1992-2020) from the European Space Agency's Climate Change Initiative. We find that the expansion of croplands and bare lands drive forest loss, while transitions from wetlands, shrublands and grasslands are key contributors to forest gain. Forest loss rates were lower when the non-forest land-cover was initially fragmented, except for settlements and bare land, where fragmentation accelerated loss. Conversely, forest gain was highest in wetlands and shrublands, though increased fragmentation generally reduced the amount and rate of forest gain. Our results show that the amount and rate of forest change are associated with the initial amount and spatial arrangement of the non-forest, transition land-cover. This insight may improve our ability to link remotely-sensed land-cover changes to the underlying drivers of global forest change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.