SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2025
Comparison of sexual function following Lichtenstein versus laparoscopic mesh repair in primary inguinal hernias, the meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSexual function following primary inguinal herniorrhaphy is a frequently discussed issue. Mesh repair methods, including Lichtenstein, Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP), and Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) repairs, are generally preferred. This review aims to address the ongoing debate regarding whether there is a difference in postoperative sexual function between Lichtenstein repair and laparoscopic repair techniques.
methodsA literature search of PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted to obtain studies on sexual functions comparing Lichtenstein and laparoscopic repair in primary inguinal hernias.
resultsIn this study, we included seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one cohort study involving 2,538 patients with primary inguinal hernia who underwent Lichtenstein, TAPP, or TEP repair. We found that the overall incidence of pain during sexual activity was significantly higher in the Lichtenstein repair group compared to the laparoscopic repair group (OR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.13, 3.25; P = 0.020). However, no significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of erectile function (P = 0.580), testicular pain (P = 0.620), and scrotal swelling (P = 0.820). Notably, pain was higher in the TEP group as opposed to Lichtenstein group, however this was not statistically significant (OR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.23, 1.12; P = 0.090).
conclusionsLichtenstein repair did not significantly impact postoperative sexual function compared to laparoscopic repair, except for a higher incidence of pain during sexual activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40762693What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.