Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40762676›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2025

Automated classification of skeletal malocclusion in German orthodontic patients.

Eva Paddenberg-Schubert, Kareem Midlej, Sebastian Krohn, Erika Kuchler, Nezar Watted, Peter Proff, Fuad A Iraqi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eva Paddenberg-Schubert *Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital of Regensburg, University of Regensburg, 93047, Regensburg, Germany.
Kareem Midlej *Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.
Sebastian Krohn *Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital of Regensburg, University of Regensburg, 93047, Regensburg, Germany.
Erika KuchlerDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Bonn, D-53111, Bonn, Germany.
Nezar WattedCenter for Dentistry Research and Aesthetics, Jatt, 4491800, Israel.
Peter Proff *Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital of Regensburg, University of Regensburg, 93047, Regensburg, Germany.
Fuad A Iraqi *Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital of Regensburg, University of Regensburg, 93047, Regensburg, Germany. fuadi@tauex.tau.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrecisely diagnosing skeletal class is mandatory for correct orthodontic treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase efficiency during diagnostics and contribute to automated workflows. So far, no AI-driven process can differentiate between skeletal classes I, II, and III in German orthodontic patients. This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to develop machine- and deep-learning models for diagnosing their skeletal class based on the gold-standard individualised ANB of Panagiotidis and Witt. MATERIALS AND

methodsOrthodontic patients treated in Germany contributed to the study population. Pre-treatment cephalometric parameters, sex, and age served as input variables. Machine-learning models performed were linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian naïve Bayes (NB), and multi class logistic regression (MCLR). Furthermore, an artificial neural network (ANN) was conducted.

results1277 German patients presented skeletal class I (48.79%), II (27.56%) and III (23.64%). The best machine-learning model, which considered all input parameters, was RF with 100% accuracy, with Calculated_ANB being the most important (0.429). The model with Calculated_ANB only achieved 100% accuracy (KNN), but ANB alone was inappropriate (71-76% accuracy). The ANN with all parameters and Calculated_ANB achieved 95.31% and 100% validation-accuracy, respectively.

conclusionsMachine- and deep-learning methods can correctly determine an individual's skeletal class. Calculated_ANB was the most important among all input parameters, which, therefore, requires precise determination. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The AI methods introduced may help to establish digital and automated workflows in cephalometric diagnostics, which could contribute to the relief of the orthodontic practitioner.

Indexed as

MalocclusionAdolescentAdultArtificial IntelligenceCephalometryChildCross-Sectional StudiesDeep LearningFemaleGermanyHumansMachine LearningMaleNeural Networks, ComputerProspective StudiesArtificial intelligenceCephalometric analysisIndividualized ANBOrthodontic diagnosticsOrthodontic treatment planningSkeletal malocclusion

Identifiers

PMID40762676
PMCPMC12325434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.