ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Dental age estimation using the London atlas- which tooth and which tooth stage predict age best (excluding 3rd molars)?
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applicability and validation of Franco, Willems and Willems II dental age estimation models in a population of Ceará, Brazil.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy and short-term safety of intravenous omadacycline as second-line therapy for macrolide- unresponsive Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based dental age estimation in adolescents using panoramic radiographs: a comparative study with traditional methods.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDeveloping teeth are frequently used to assess the developing dentition and to predict age. The London Atlas of Tooth Development estimates age as a single value (midpoint of an age interval). The aim was to determine which tooth stage, tooth, or combination of maxillary/mandibular teeth best estimates age using the Atlas. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe sample was 946 archived panoramic radiographs (491 male, 455 female) of dental patients aged 3-16 years. Crown and root stages of 8323 developing permanent teeth on the left side were assessed. Dental age (DA) was calculated for each tooth using 3rd edition of London Atlas App. Mean difference (MD) and mean absolute difference (MAD) between estimated and chronological age (CA) for each age category and for each tooth was calculated. Student t-test was used to assess MD. A linear regression model assessed predictive strength of individual teeth and combination of teeth with collinearity expressed as variance inflation factor (VIF).
resultsThe second premolar, canine and central incisor showed high collinearity with other teeth; excluding them did not improve age prediction. Individual tooth stages of different teeth could estimate age best for ages 3 to 12. DISCUSSION: No single tooth predicted age best for all individual age categories for this sample because a single tooth stage spans more than one year. Different teeth were accurate for different age categories but the second molars from both jaws showed small MD, MAD and lower VIF values than other teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.