ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2025
The Impact of Diverse Kratom Products on Use Patterns, Dependence, and Toxicity.
Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Characteristics of adverse reactions to kratom and implementation of harm reduction strategies in a sample of ethnobotanical tea bar patrons in Colorado.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
- Article
- From kratom to 7-hydroxymitragynine: evolution of a natural remedy into a public-health threat.Pharmaceutical biology · 2025Review
- An Initial Survey Assessing the Temporal Relationship of Kratom Initiation With Medical Treatment and Substance Use.Substance use : research and treatmentArticle
- Pharmacists' Perceived Knowledge of Kratom and Hemp-Derived Cannabinoids Before and after Education.Substance use : research and treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewKratom products have been available in the US for over a decade. Initially, these products were almost entirely made from kratom leaf material and formulated in powders, capsules, or tablets. Recently, more diverse kratom products and derivatives have been marketed and sold, including extracts, concentrates, and isolates. This review focuses on the differing symptom presentation of products containing concentrated or isolated kratom-derived alkaloids that may cause substantial risks to consumers. RECENT
findingsRecently, several concentrated or semi-synthetic products have entered the market that are advertised as kratom, but which pharmacologically bear little similarity to traditional kratom. Although the alkaloid content naturally ranges from 2 to 5% in native leaf material, it can be up to 60% in concentrated extracts. Most concerning are the products containing pure, isolated 7-hydroxymitragynine and mitragynine pseudoindoxyl. These derivatives of kratom alkaloids are not naturally present in leaf material, but function as more potent opioid agonists than morphine. Products marketed as kratom but containing much higher alkaloid concentrations than found in the natural kratom leaf, or semi-synthetic isolates of highly potent alkaloid derivatives not typically found in the plant, represent a growing public health concern. There is minimal clinical research to assess their safety or regulation to ensure safe manufacturing practices. Limited pre-clinical data indicate that these products pose a greater risk of toxicity, drug interactions, and physiologic dependence. And based on misleading advertising, consumers may be unaware of the differences and increased risks associated with these products compared with traditional whole leaf kratom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40762659What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.