Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40762565›Full record

ArticleJASA express letters2025

A comparison of electrophysiological measures for characterizing the cochlear-implant electrode-neuron interface.

Charlotte Garcia, Fergio Sismono, Tobias Goehring, François Guérit, Dorothée Arzounian, Robert P Carlyon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JASA express letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charlotte GarciaCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB17EF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-3927
Fergio SismonoEuropean Institute for ORL-HNS (EIORL) ZAS Augustinus, Oosterveldlaan 24, 2610 Wilrijk - Antwerp, Belgiumcharlotte.garcia@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk, fergio.sismono@zas.be, tobias.goehring@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk, francois.guerit@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk, dorothee.arzounian@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk, bob.carlyon@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4611-8632
Tobias GoehringCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB17EF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9038-3310
François GuéritCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB17EF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9404-3575
Dorothée ArzounianCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB17EF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1520-0227
Robert P CarlyonCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB17EF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6166-501X

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health of the auditory nerve is a key factor for hearing outcomes in cochlear-implant patients. Many electrophysiological markers of auditory-neural health have been proposed, with varying predictive power and independence from non-neural factors. The "Failure Index" (FI), the ratio between stimulation current level and response magnitude of the electrically-evoked compound action potential (eCAP) was compared to the Panoramic eCAP method. Both methods predicted localized areas of reduced neural responsiveness in a group of human cochlear-implant users, but the FI showed a greater dependence on a non-neural factor, namely, the distances between the cochlear-implant electrodes and the auditory nerves.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsCochlear NerveAction PotentialsAdultAgedElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurons

Identifiers

PMID40762565
PMCPMC12333378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.