ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
Perinatal impacts of fetal growth velocity on small-for-gestational-age fetuses: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary center.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perinatal impacts of fetal growth velocity on small-for-gestational-age fetuses: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary center.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe perinatal risk of reduced growth velocity among small for gestational age (SGA) has been poorly studied. Therefore, we assessed the impact of abdominal fetal growth velocity on perinatal morbidity and mortality among SGA fetuses with positive umbilical artery end-diastolic flow. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted between January 1, 2018, and May 31, 2022, at a tertiary center. We included women with a singleton pregnancy, at least two ultrasounds with an estimated fetal weight in the <10th percentile at least 2 weeks apart between gestational weeks 24 and 36, and a positive umbilical artery end-diastolic flow. Abdominal circumference growth velocity (ACGV) was calculated. For each ACGV, a z-score was calculated using INTERGROWTH-21 standards. Reduced growth velocity (ACGV z score < -2) and normal (ACGV z score ≥ -2) groups were compared based on a composite perinatal criterion defined as one of the following: stillbirth, 5-min Apgar score <7, arterial pH at birth <7.10, neonatal intensive care unit admission, or infant death before discharge.
resultsAmong the 216 women included, 14.4% (31/216) had a fetus with reduced abdominal circumference growth velocity group and 85.6% (185/216) had a fetus with normal ACGV. Adverse neonatal outcomes occurred significantly more often in the reduced growth velocity group (58% in the reduced ACGV group vs 33% in the normal ACGV; p = 0.007). Nulliparous women, hypertensive disorders, and cerebroplacental redistribution at baseline and final Doppler examinations were significantly more frequent in the reduced ACGV group. After adjustment for confounding factors, ACGV z score < -2 was not significantly associated with an increased risk of perinatal adverse outcome (adjusted odds ratio [ORa] = 1.99), (95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.8-4.91]). However, hypertensive disorders (ORa = 4.48, 95% CI: [2-10.02]), cerebroplacental redistribution on the final Doppler examination (ORa = 3.12, 95% CI: [1.07-9.05]), and gestational diabetes (ORa = 3.72, 95% CI: [1.62-8.54]) remained statistically associated with increased perinatal morbidity risk.
conclusionsAmong SGA fetuses, reduced abdominal circumference growth velocity was not associated with an increased adverse perinatal outcome risk. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of growth velocity on the issues of SGA fetuses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.