ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025
Thin-Layer Behavior in Carbon Nanopipettes. Understanding the Iontronic-Electronic Contributions.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoelectroanalysis with Carbon Nanopipettes Based on Prussian Blue-NiHCF for Hydrogen Peroxide Sensing.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Individually addressable multichannel nanoelectrodes reveal spatially resolved functional heterogeneity of vesicles in single cells.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Scan-Rate-Induced Transition from Redox to Ion Current Rectification in Carbon Nanopipettes.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Fundamental Insights into Nanoconfined Devices by Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanopipettes with carbon-coated inner surfaces (carbon nanopipettes, CNPs) have attracted considerable attention due to their exceptional sensitivity and potential in electroanalytical applications. The nanoconfinement of the sample solution within the CNP facilitates a thin-layer electrochemical regime, in which ion and electron transferences are inherently coupled. This feature allows exhaustive oxidation/reduction of certain analytes within typical electroanalytical time scales, offering unprecedented opportunities for nanoscale sensing. Despite this promising advantage, a detailed understanding of how measurement dimensions and experimental conditions influence key electrochemical responses remains significantly underexplored. Effectively, conventional electrochemical methods frequently struggle with decoupling ionic and redox contributions, which are critical for understanding the performance toward optimal exploitation. For the first time, cyclic voltammetry (CV), numerical simulations, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) are combined to systematically investigate the interplay between ion transport and electron transfer in the electrochemical behavior of CNPs. CV experiments were used to assess essential parameters under varying electrolyte compositions, solution depths, and scan rates, achieving signal-to-noise ratio enhancements of over 10-fold and submicromolar detection of the redox couple at the rationalized conditions. Complementarily, it is demonstrated that EIS can resolve the nanofluidic behavior by deconvoluting iontronic and electronic contributions, opening an option to be investigated more extensively in future research. The present study not only provides insights into the unique thin-layer electrochemical behavior of CNPs but also establishes the feasibility of simultaneously obtaining iontronic and electronic information with a single setup. This dual capability is poised to advance both related applications, e.g., sensing, (bio)catalysis, imaging, and fundamental directions in nanoelectrochemistry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.