ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025
Predictors of response to emergent therapies in paediatric immune thrombocytopenia.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Significance of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Predictors of response to emergent therapies in paediatric immune thrombocytopenia.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergent therapies (ET), which include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), corticosteroids and intravenous anti-Rho(D) immunoglobulin, are used to treat acute episodes of bleeding in children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). There are currently no known biomarkers or clinical features predictive of treatment response to any specific ET. Thus, the treatment of ITP remains largely trial and error, exposing patients to potentially ineffective medications, which are often expensive and associated with adverse effects. We therefore sought to identify the predictors of treatment response through comparison of clinical characteristics in paediatric patients with ITP responsive to ET versus those non-responsive to ET. We identified high rates of non-response to ET in our cohort of 511 children diagnosed with ITP over a recent 5-year period. Through a multivariable logistic regression model, we identified the presence of secondary ITP, the presence of systemic lupus erythematosus, a positive baseline direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and a high baseline IgA level as predictors of non-response to IVIG. In the future, management guidelines that incorporate predictors of response could help individualize treatment for each patient, achieving better response rates that ensure less bleeding-related morbidity and avoid unnecessary side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.