ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025
Analysis of Intraoperative and Postoperative Hinge Fractures of Patients With Genu Valgum Treated With Lateral Open Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHinge fracture is a known complication of lateral open wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO). However, few studies have differentiated between intraoperative hinge fractures (IHF) and postoperative hinge fractures (PHF). This study aims to investigate the causes of these two types of fractures to help reduce complication rates and improve surgical outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 100 patients with genu valgum deformity and lateral unicompartmental osteoarthritis who underwent distal femoral osteotomy at our hospital between January 1st, 2022, and January 1st, 2024, in our hospital. Clinical parameters, radiological data, and the associated factors influencing IHF and PHF were analyzed. Radiological data such as mechanical axis deviation (MAD) and mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA) were collected. Clinical outcomes such as osteoarthritis index and time of healing were evaluated. Based on fracture morphology, IHF and PHF were further classified into Type 1 (extension), Type 2 (distal) and Type 3 (proximal) for detailed analysis. Statistical analyses included t-tests, Chi-square tests, and regression models to identify factors associated with IHF and PHF.
resultsA total of 87 patients were included in this study. The mean healing time of patients with all kinds of hinge fractures (3.4 ± 1.2 months) was longer than that of patients with no hinge fractures (2.8 ± 0.7 months), which was significant, p = 0.013. The MAD correction, mLDFA correction, and mLDFA correction ratio were related to hinge fractures (p = 0.010, 0.002, and 0.002 respectively). The body weight was higher in all types of hinge fractures group (IHF and PHF together) than the no hinge fractures group. The IHF group had a longer time of healing than the no IHF group. In the IHF group, the mLDFA correction (p = 0.005), mLDFA correction ratio (p = 0.005), and BMI (p = 0.031) were higher than the no IHF group. The PHF was related to hinge position. The group of hinge localized proximal to the adductor tubercle (AT) had a higher rate of PHF than the group of hinge localized in the adductor tubercle (p = 0.001). The healing time in the IHF group (3.9 ± 1.4 months) was significantly longer than the healing time in the PHF group (2.7 ± 0.4 months) (p = 0.002).
conclusionIn patients with genu valgum undergoing LOWDFO, IHF and PHF represent distinct clinical entities. IHF is associated with greater mLDFA correction, higher mLDFA correction ratios, and increased body weight. In contrast, PHF is primarily associated with hinge position, with a higher incidence observed when the hinge is located proximal to the adductor tubercle. Among the two, IHF has a more pronounced impact on delayed bone healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective study Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.