Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40762022›Full record

ArticleCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)2025

Dynamic Network Plasticity and Sample Efficiency in Biological Neural Cultures: A Comparative Study with Deep Reinforcement Learning.

Moein Khajehnejad, Forough Habibollahi, Alon Loeffler, Aswin Paul, Adeel Razi, Brett J Kagan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Organoid Brain-Machine-Interface Devices for Central Nervous System Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Organoid intelligence for developmental neurotoxicity testing.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moein KhajehnejadCortical Labs, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2185-4596
Forough HabibollahiCortical Labs, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6059-3723
Alon LoefflerCortical Labs, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8866-3073
Aswin PaulIITB-Monash Research Academy, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8559-4711
Adeel RaziTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-9439
Brett J KaganCortical Labs, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7604-7444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the complex network dynamics of in vitro neural systems using DishBrain, which integrates live neural cultures with high-density multi-electrode arrays in real-time, closed-loop game environments. By embedding spiking activity into lower-dimensional spaces, we distinguish between spontaneous activity (Rest) and Gameplay conditions, revealing underlying patterns crucial for real-time monitoring and manipulation. Our analysis highlights dynamic changes in connectivity during Gameplay, underscoring the highly sample efficient plasticity of these networks in response to stimuli. To explore whether this was meaningful in a broader context, we compared the learning efficiency of these biological systems with state-of-the-art deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms (Deep Q Network, Advantage Actor-Critic, and Proximal Policy Optimization) in a simplified Pong simulation. Through this, we introduce a meaningful comparison between biological neural systems and deep RL. We find that when samples are limited to a real-world time course, even these very simple biological cultures outperformed deep RL algorithms across various game performance characteristics, implying a higher sample efficiency.

Identifiers

PMID40762022
PMCPMC12320521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.