ArticleIDCases2025
An unusual clinical presentation of Cryptococcal meningitis: The importance of a detailed history and physical.
Article in IDCases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of the Therapeutic Challenges and Novel Treatment Options in Mitigating Invasive Mycosis Associated withJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Liposomal Methylglyoxal Targets Virulence and Intracellular Persistence to Overcome Amphotericin B Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- CSF Leukocytes in Intracranial Infections: Diagnostic, Mechanistic, and Therapeutic Insights for Neurocritical Care.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Cryptococcal Meningitis Without Headache: A Case Report Highlighting an Atypical Presentation.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Cryptococcal meningitis is a severe fungal infection that can present with a highly variable range of neuro-ophthalmic and systemic symptoms. Although more classically associated with immunocompromised individuals, it has increasingly been reported in immunocompetent hosts. Cryptococcus neoformans is typically linked to opportunistic infections in immunosuppressed populations, whereas Cryptococcus gattii more commonly affects immunocompetent individuals. Observations: A healthy 40-year-old female presented with new onset recurrent headaches. After a normal MRI, she was re-assured by multiple physicians and given a presumptive diagnosis of stress induced migraine, as she had recently experienced the sudden unexpected death of her husband. Persistent and progressive headaches, focusing difficulties, and extreme photosensitivity prompted her to seek further evaluation by an ophthalmologist, who diagnosed her with Cryptococcal meningitis based on her lumbar puncture results. Discussion and importance: Despite the initial clinical impression being suggestive of migraines, the patient was ultimately diagnosed with cryptococcal meningitis one month from the initial onset of her symptoms, with rapid advancement to an emergent situation ultimately resulting in two hospitalizations where she received numerous spinal fluid drainages, anti-fungal medications and a lumbar shunt. This case underscores the importance of comprehensive history-taking, clinical vigilance, and maintaining a broad differential diagnosis in the workup of any patient. Ocular symptoms, in this instance, served as an early manifestation of cryptococcal meningitis in an immunocompetent patient, highlighting the need for heightened awareness in clinical practice to ensure timely diagnosis and appropriate management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.