ArticleCureus2025
A Pilot Study of Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification Using Google Teachable Machine: A No-Code Artificial Intelligence Approach.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning for detecting early gastric cancer with white-light endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-based screening of phytochemicals for targeted cancer therapy.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Breast cancer remains a major global cause of cancer-related mortality, where histopathology serves as the diagnostic cornerstone. However, inter-observer variability and increasing diagnostic workload necessitate innovative solutions. This pilot study assesses the feasibility and diagnostic performance of a no-code, browser-based artificial intelligence platform, Google Teachable Machine (GTM; Google Creative Lab, New York, NY, USA), for classifying breast histopathology images into clinically relevant categories. Methods A total of 380 hematoxylin and eosin-stained images, equally distributed among four diagnostic categories (normal, benign, in situ carcinoma, invasive carcinoma), were sourced from an open-access repository. The GTM model was trained with 85% of the data (50 epochs; batch size 16; learning rate 0.0001), and externally validated on 39 independent images. Performance metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Results The model achieved an internal validation accuracy of 88.3%, with per-class accuracies of 87% for Normal, 93% for Benign, 87% for In Situ Carcinoma, and 87% for Invasive Carcinoma. On external validation using 39 independent images, the model demonstrated an overall accuracy of 76.9%, with a macro-averaged F1-score of 0.77 and a weighted-averaged F1-score of 0.77. Class-wise external performance metrics included precision, recall, and F1-scores of 1.00, 0.70, and 0.82 for Normal; 0.67, 0.80, and 0.73 for Benign; 0.67, 1.00, and 0.80 for In Situ Carcinoma; and 1.00, 0.56, and 0.71 for Invasive Carcinoma, respectively. The model exhibited high precision across most classes but demonstrated reduced recall for invasive carcinoma, reflecting challenges in distinguishing invasive from non-invasive lesions within the constraints of a limited dataset. Conclusion GTM demonstrated preliminary feasibility for multi-class breast histopathology classification using small datasets without coding expertise. While performance was encouraging, particularly for normal and in situ categories, limitations such as reduced invasive carcinoma sensitivity and small sample size underscore the need for larger datasets, advanced architectures, and explainable AI methods to enhance clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.