ArticleCureus2025
A Retrospective Audit of the Management of Shoulder Dislocations at a Trauma Unit.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionShoulder dislocation is the most common major joint dislocation encountered in our emergency department, with anterior dislocation accounting for the vast majority. This retrospective audit evaluates adherence to the health board guidelines for managing traumatic shoulder instability at Grange University Hospital.
methodsData from 100 patients presenting with native shoulder dislocations between January 2021 and February 2024 were analyzed. Clinical notes, radiological records, and procedural details were reviewed to assess compliance with imaging protocols, reduction procedures, and follow-up care.
resultsThe mean patient age was 44 years, with a female predominance of 52% (52 out of 100). Anterior dislocations constituted 83% of cases (83 patients), with posterior and inferior dislocations accounting for 16% (16 patients) and 1% (one patient), respectively. Manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) was successful in 98% of cases (98 out of 100 patients), while 2% (two patients) required open reduction. Pre- and post-reduction imaging was performed in 97% of patients. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were frequently used to assess associated injuries, which included Hill-Sachs lesions, greater tuberosity fractures, and rotator cuff tears. Neurological complications were identified in 28 patients (28%), primarily involving the axillary nerve. Posterior dislocations were more prevalent than typically reported, suggesting heightened diagnostic awareness.
conclusionThis audit demonstrates strong compliance with established clinical protocols, reflected in high MUA success rates and effective identification of injury-related complications. However, areas for improvement have been identified to further improve clinical management and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.