ArticleCureus2025
A Rare Case of Prostate Abscess With Pyelonephritis in an Adolescent Male.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostatic abscess is a rare urological condition in adolescents. We report the case of a 16-year-old male with no significant past medical history who presented with bilateral flank pain, dysuria, and systemic signs of infection. Imaging revealed bilateral pyelonephritis and a prostatic abscess. Initial conservative treatment with intravenous antibiotics alone showed no improvement, prompting ultrasound-guided transperineal aspiration of the abscess under general anesthesia along with antibiotics. The patient showed marked clinical improvement and was discharged. This case highlights the importance of including prostatic abscess in the differential diagnosis for adolescent males with persistent urinary symptoms and sepsis. It demonstrates the efficacy of transperineal drainage as a relatively safe and minimally invasive intervention in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.