Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761943›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2025

Leveraging scenario differences for cross-task generalization in water plant transfer machine learning models.

Yu-Qi Wang, Xiao-Qin Luo, Han-Bo Zhou, Jia-Ji Chen, Wan-Xin Yin, Yun-Peng Song, Hao-Bo Wang, Bai Yu, Yu Tao, Hong-Cheng Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yu-Qi WangState Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Eco-Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Xiao-Qin LuoState Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Eco-Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Han-Bo ZhouState Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Eco-Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Jia-Ji ChenState Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Eco-Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Wan-Xin YinState Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Eco-Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Yun-Peng SongState Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Eco-Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Hao-Bo WangKey Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering (Ministry of Education), Dalian Key Laboratory on Chemicals Risk Control and Pollution Prevention Technology, School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China.
Bai YuUnicom Digital Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, 100032, China.
Yu TaoState Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Eco-Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Hong-Cheng WangState Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Eco-Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Ai-Jie WangState Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Eco-Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Nan-Qi RenState Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Eco-Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly deployed in urban water systems to optimize operations, enhance efficiency, and curb resource consumption amid growing sustainability demands. Yet, their transferability across plants is hampered by scenario differences-variations in environmental factors, protocols, and data distributions-that erode performance and necessitate energy-intensive retraining. While existing strategies focus on minimizing these differences via domain adaptation or fine-tuning, none exploit them as inherent prior knowledge for improved generalization. Here we show an environmental information adaptive transfer network (EIATN) framework that can leverage scenario differences to enable effective generalization across distinct prediction tasks within the same water plant. By evaluating EIATN across four scenario categories and 16 diverse ML architectures-yielding 64 models in total-we demonstrate its feasibility, with bidirectional long short-term memory emerging as the top performer, achieving a mean absolute percentage error of just 3.8 % while requiring only 32.8 % of the typical data volume. In a case study of Shenzhen's urban water system, it reduced carbon emissions by 40.8 % compared to fine-tuning and 66.8 % relative to direct modeling from scratch. EIATN unlocks the reuse of vast existing ML models in water systems, yielding substantial energy savings and fostering equitable, low-carbon intelligent management.

Indexed as

Drinking water treatmentModel generalizationTransfer learningUrban water systemWastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID40761943
PMCPMC12320164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.