ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
The impact of the 2020 diagnostic reference level revision and the development of national regulations on occupational radiation protection in medical facilities in Japan.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the impact of revisions to the diagnostic reference levels and the Regulation on Prevention of Ionizing Radiation Hazards on radiation safety management in medical institutions by investigating changes in the awareness of occupational and medical radiation exposure and improvements in radiation protection. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to 799 facilities with angiography or nuclear medicine departments and responses were obtained from 424 facilities. The results showed that nonuniform exposure assessments were conducted in 93% of the facilities. Following regulatory revision, protective measures were reassessed in many facilities, leading to the increased use of protective eyewear and lens dosimeters. Notably, the adoption rate of lens dosimeters reached approximately 60%, suggesting heightened concerns about lens exposure. After the publication of the 2020 Diagnostic Reference Levels, many medical institutions reviewed the exposure conditions, with approximately 90% of the CT facilities modifying their parameters. These findings indicate that regulatory changes have contributed to an increased awareness of radiation protection and the reinforcement of specific protective measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.