ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Predicting mortality in intensive care unit patients with acute pancreatitis using an interpretable machine learning model.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpretable XGBoost-SHAP model predicts short-term recurrence after first-episode acute pancreatitis.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is linked to elevated in-hospital mortality rates. Timely identification of high-risk patients remains challenging. This study aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with AP and to identify key contributing factors. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 306 ICU patients diagnosed with AP. After data preprocessing and feature selection via the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), seven machine learning models were developed: decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and logistic regression. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was utilized to interpret model predictions and assess feature importance rankings. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the following independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with AP: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), albumin (Alb), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), use of vasoactive agents, and ICU length of stay. The AUC values for the seven machine learning models in the training set were DT (0.947), RF (0.900), XGBoost (0.887), SVM (0.901), MLP (0.837), KNN (0.983), and LR (0.876). In the validation set, the corresponding AUC values were DT (0.698), RF (0.850), XGBoost (0.878), SVM (0.892), MLP (0.822), KNN (0.755), and LR (0.858). Although DT and KNN demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in the training set, their performance was suboptimal in the validation set. SHAP analysis ranked APACHE II score as the most influential predictor of mortality. Conclusion: An interpretable SVM model incorporating routinely available clinical variables effectively predicts in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with AP. SHAP-enhanced interpretation highlights key predictors and enhances model transparency, supporting clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.