Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761840›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Canine olfactory detection of florfenicol residues in goat milk: a pilot study.

Maaike O Clapham, Dierdra McElroy, Melissa A Mercer, Philip H Kass, Lisa A Tell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maaike O ClaphamDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Dierdra McElroyLaika Diagnostics, California Canine, Lathrop, CA, United States.
Melissa A MercerDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Philip H KassDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Lisa A TellDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Canine olfaction has been used to detect drug residues across a variety of matrices as part of law enforcement efforts. As such, canine olfactory sample screening should hold promise as a potential tool for detecting drug residues in food products to support human food safety in resource limited settings or where sensitive analytical methods are not available for various matrices. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the ability of companion dogs undergoing low-frequency olfactory detection training to detect florfenicol and its metabolite, florfenicol amine (FA), in incurred residue goat milk samples. Methods: Companion dogs ( Results: For study phase 1, mean detection accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.74-0.86), 0.70 (95% CI 0.65-0.76), and 0.86 (95% CI 0.82-0.88)], respectively. Sensitivity increased with higher drug concentrations, ranging from 0.38 at 17.96 ppb to 0.96 at 1443.30 ppb. Study phase 2 accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91), 0.82 (95% CI 0.73-0.88), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.94), respectively. False positives were most often associated with blank goat milk. Discussion: Companion dogs undergoing low-frequency olfactory odor detection training were able to detect florfenicol/FA residues in goat milk with high specificity, particularly at high concentrations. However, sensitivity at low concentrations was limited. While canine olfactory detection does not appear to be suitable as a confirmatory method for companion dogs with low training commitments, this pilot study demonstrates its potential as an initial screening tool, particularly in resource-limited settings. Future research is needed to refine training protocols and assess performance under field conditions.

Indexed as

caninedrug residue detectionflorfenicolgoatmilkolfaction

Identifiers

PMID40761840
PMCPMC12320535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.