Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761831›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025

High-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation improves long-term success in radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

Yap-Hang Will Chan, Hoi-Ying Li, Hung-Fat Tse, Claire A Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yap-Hang Will ChanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5384-8468
Hoi-Ying LiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4049-0915
Hung-Fat TseDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9578-7808
Claire A MartinDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0AY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4143-6308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: High-frequency low-tidal volume (HFLTV) ventilation may improve catheter stability and enhance procedural success in radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Long-term findings remained unclear. Methods and results: We conducted a meta-analysis that included all studies that directly compared AF patients who underwent RF ablation under HFLTV compared with standard ventilation. Primary outcomes included acute first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and long-term recurrence of AF/atrial arrhythmias after 12 months. Secondary outcomes included total procedure duration, ablation time, and RF time, with pooled standardized mean difference derived using the inverse variance method. Five cohort studies (publication period: 2019-2024) were identified and included in the meta-analysis (final sample: HFLTV Conclusion: High-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation is associated with improved long-term success of arrhythmia control in AF patients who undergo RF catheter ablation, regardless of paroxysmal or persistent status.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationCatheter ablationHigh-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation

Identifiers

PMID40761831
PMCPMC12319537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.