ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Efficacy of combined rigid and flexible ureteroscopy for complex ureteral stones in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of diabetes mellitus on stone access and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a retrospective cohort study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Gut barrier-microbiota crosstalk in sepsis: from pathogenesis to potential therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients with complex ureteral stones face significant challenges in terms of treatment outcomes, including higher risk for complications such as sepsis and prolonged recovery times. The efficacy of combined rigid and flexible ureteroscopy in managing these stones in T2DM patients remains underexplored. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at our hospital from January 2021 to August 2024. The study included patients aged 18-65 years diagnosed with T2DM and complex ureteral stones (size >1 cm, multiple stones, or those in difficult-to-reach areas). Exclusion criteria involved uncontrolled urinary tract infections, renal malformations, and other significant comorbidities that could hinder surgical success. A total of 182 patients were included, with 93 receiving combined rigid and flexible ureteroscopy (observation group) and 89 undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) (control group). The study followed STROBE guidelines, and ethical approval was obtained. Preoperative blood glucose control and surgical interventions were managed in accordance with standard protocols. Results: The observation group exhibited superior perioperative outcomes, with significantly shorter surgery time, less intraoperative blood loss, and a reduced duration of hematuria compared to the control group. Stone clearance at 7 days postoperatively was significantly higher in the observation group (54.84%) compared to the control group (39.33%) (P=0.036). Additionally, CRP levels were lower in the observation group at 3 and 5 days postoperatively, indicating less postoperative inflammation. The incidence of postoperative sepsis was significantly associated with female gender, age ≥60, BMI ≥25 kg/m², preoperative positive urine culture, and elevated CRP and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels. Conclusions: Combined rigid and flexible ureteroscopy offers a promising approach for managing complex ureteral stones in T2DM patients, providing better early stone clearance, reduced postoperative complications, and improved recovery outcomes compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Risk factors for postoperative sepsis in this patient population include older age, female gender, higher BMI, preoperative urine culture positivity, and elevated CRP and FPG levels. Further studies are necessary to confirm long-term benefits and optimize sepsis prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.