ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Machine learning-based strategies for improving healthcare data quality: an evaluation of accuracy, completeness, and reusability.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Precision Oral Medicine in Pemphigus Vulgaris: A Conceptual AI Framework for Rituximab Response Prediction.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Medical Records to AI-Ready Datasets: A Practical Guide for Clinical Researchers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Care:Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence approaches to predicting treatment non-adherence in chronic diseases: a narrative review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare data quality is a critical factor in clinical decision-making, diagnostic accuracy, and the overall efficacy of healthcare systems. This study addresses key challenges such as missing values and anomalies in healthcare datasets, which can result in misdiagnoses and inefficient resource use. The objective is to develop and evaluate a machine learning-based strategy to improve healthcare data quality, with a focus on three core dimensions: accuracy, completeness, and reusability. A publicly available diabetes dataset comprising 768 records and 9 variables was used. The methodology involved a comprehensive data preprocessing workflow, including data acquisition, cleaning, and exploratory analysis using established Python tools. Missing values were addressed using K-nearest neighbors imputation, while anomaly detection was performed using ensemble techniques. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and correlation analysis were applied to identify key predictors of diabetes, such as Glucose, BMI, and Age. The results showed significant improvements in data completeness (from 90.57% to nearly 100%), better accuracy by mitigating anomalies, and enhanced reusability for downstream machine learning tasks. In predictive modeling, Random Forest outperformed LightGBM, achieving an accuracy of 75.3% and an AUC of 0.83. The process was fully documented, and reproducibility tools were integrated to ensure the methodology could be replicated and extended. These findings demonstrate the potential of machine learning to support robust data quality improvement frameworks in healthcare, ultimately contributing to better clinical outcomes and predictive capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.