ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia with aberrant CD19 expression.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translational potential of γδ T cells in hematologic diseases: from immunobiology to therapeutic innovation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Precision medicine with car cells in acute myeloid leukemia: where are we?Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Leveraging Immunotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment: Opportunities and Challenges.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: T (8; 21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a special type of acute leukemia, and exhibits a heterogeneous prognosis, with a long-term relapse rate of about 40%. Once t(8; 21) AML patients experience relapse, they have an extremely poor prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival rate of less than 15%. Therefore, it is crucial to develop effective strategies to improve the prognosis of relapsed/refractory (R/R) t(8; 21) AML. CD19 is a specific B-cell surface marker, but it is aberrantly expressed in 50-80 % of t(8; 21) AML patients. CAR-T cells targeting aberrant cell-surface antigens could induce the depletion of tumor cells without the destruction of hematopoiesis. Therefore, CD19 might be a promising target for CAR-T cell therapy in R/R t(8; 21) AML with aberrant CD19 expression. The present study is aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in R/R t(8;21) AML with aberrant CD19 expression. Methods: In the present study, 3 R/R t(8;21) AML patients with aberrant CD19 expression were enrolled. After lymphodepleting chemotherapy, 3 patients received autologous CAR-T cell infusion at a dose of 1.0 × 10^6 cells/kg, 2.0 × 10^6 cells/kg, and 2.0 × 10^6 cells/kg, respectively. Results: They all achieved CD19 negativity approximately half a month after CD19 CAR-T cell infusion. These indicate CD19 CAR-T cell therapy is effective in R/R t(8;21) AML with aberrant CD19 expression. However, patient 1 and patient 2 rapidly relapsed within 3 months after CD19 CAR-T cell therapy. Subsequently, patient 1 received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Fortunately, patient 1 achieved mCR 2 months after allo-HSCT. Conclusion: Considering the short-term remission of CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in R/R t(8;21) AML, allo-HSCT might be performed as soon as possible to consolidate the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy and reduce the risk of relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.