ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Exploring the predictive "psycho-biomarkers" for checkpoint immunotherapy in cancer.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital immune twins and ai-integrated multi-omic biomarkers: Redefining personalized immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent decades, cancer immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape, offering significant advantages over traditional therapies by improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment has been associated with an increased risk of mortality in its early stages. Therefore, identifying reliable biomarkers to predict which patients will benefit clinically from ICIs therapy is critical. Depression, a common form of chronic psychological stress, has emerged as a regulator of tumor immunity and is gaining attention as a target for novel cancer treatments. To date, no studies have explored the potential of depression-related genes in predicting response to ICIs therapy. Methods: Public datasets of ICIs-treated patients were obtained from the TCGA and GEO databases, followed by comprehensive analyses, including bulk mRNA sequencing (mRNA-seq), co-expression network construction, and Gene Ontology enrichment. Regression analysis, using Cox proportional hazards and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso), identified eight depression-related genes to build a predictive model for clinical outcomes in ICIs therapy. Additionally, correlations were explored between the depression-related predictive score and clinical parameters, including tumor mutational burden (TMB) and immune cell infiltration, establishing the score as a potential predictor of ICIs response. Results: The model categorized patients into high- and low-responsiveness groups, with significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) between them. Validation using both internal and external datasets demonstrated the model's strong predictive accuracy. Further analysis revealed that this response stratification correlates with immune cell abundance and TMB in cancer patients. Conclusion: This study suggests that depression-related genetic traits could serve as biomarkers for ICIs therapy response, tumor mutations, and immune system alterations. Our findings offer insights into personalized therapeutic strategies for early intervention and prognosis in specific cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.