Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761776›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Understanding adolescent girls' thoughts and opinions on having social media influencers deliver body image and mental health support: A mixed-methods study.

Sharon Haywood, Phillippa C Diedrichs, Nicole Paraskeva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sharon HaywoodUniversity of the West of England, Centre for Appearance Research, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-5406
Phillippa C DiedrichsUniversity of the West of England, Centre for Appearance Research, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5028-4134
Nicole ParaskevaUniversity of the West of England, Centre for Appearance Research, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8899-6970

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Influencers have been used to deliver messaging in public health campaigns and have begun collaborating with researchers to deliver evidence-based content. Building on this approach, this study explored adolescent girls' perspectives on influencers and utilising influencers to deliver body image and mental health interventions. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted with 375 UK-based girls ( Results: Most participants expressed likeability, credibility, authenticity, and relatability were key influencer qualities when choosing to trust an influencer, whilst their ethnicity, gender, and body size were not important. In considering intervention development, the most salient factor in trusting an influencer about body image was that the influencer shared their own experiences. Participants preferred offline body image support (47%) versus online (38%); however, just over 60% agreed that influencer-delivered body image interventions were a good idea. The content analysis generated three main categories: 'Influencer-delivered interventions would be helpful' (53.5%), encompassing the offer of support and online environment as ideal; 'influencer-delivered interventions would be unhelpful' (28.1%), including influencers are not qualified and the toxicity of the internet; and 'influencer qualities' (18.3%), such as relatability. Conclusion: Overall, adolescent girls thought an influencer-driven approach could be helpful in improving their body image and mental health. Caveats included that the influencer must be trustworthy, relatable, and authentic, which could encompass self-disclosure related to their mental health.

Indexed as

Adolescenceadolescent girlsbody imageinfluencersinterventionsmental healthmixed methodsUK

Identifiers

PMID40761776
PMCPMC12319284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.