Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761772›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025

Leveraging data to transform surgical outcomes and precision in orthopaedics.

Gnanaprakash Gurusamy, Rishi Mugesh Kanna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gnanaprakash GurusamyDepartment of Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India.
Rishi Mugesh KannaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of evidence-based clinical practice, large data sources, including national registries, electronic health records, imaging studies, and well documented patient-related outcomes, play a crucial role. Especially in orthopaedic surgery, the use of data-driven methods can contribute to more informed decision-making, improved clinical outcomes, and surgical precision. Tools like machine learning and predictive models can analyze this complex dataset and assist in selecting patients for appropriate treatment, identifying risk factors, and personalizing treatment strategies. The application of evolving modern surgical technologies such as computer-assisted and robotic surgery can facilitate improved preoperative planning, surgical accuracy, and better postoperative care. However, several limitations and challenges exist, including inconsistent data quality, ethical considerations, limited resources, and a lack of transparency. As artificial intelligence gains traction in healthcare, there is a need for embracing data-driven approach in orthopaedic surgery, and its thoughtful integration into clinical practice for safe, efficient, accurate, and patient-centred care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceData-drivenMachine learningOrthopedicsPredictive model

Identifiers

PMID40761772
PMCPMC12318289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.