Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761769›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

UpStory: the uppsala storytelling dataset.

Marc Fraile, Natalia Calvo-Barajas, Anastasia Sophia Apeiron, Giovanna Varni, Joakim Lindblad, Nataša Sladoje, Ginevra Castellano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marc FraileDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Natalia Calvo-BarajasDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anastasia Sophia ApeironDepartment of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Giovanna VarniDepartment of Information Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Joakim LindbladDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nataša SladojeDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ginevra CastellanoDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Friendship and rapport play an important role in the formation of constructive social interactions, and have been widely studied in education due to their impact on learning outcomes. Given the growing interest in automating the analysis of such phenomena through Machine Learning, access to annotated interaction datasets is highly valuable. However, no dataset on child-child interactions explicitly capturing rapport currently exists. Moreover, despite advances in the automatic analysis of human behavior, no previous work has addressed the prediction of rapport in child-child interactions in educational settings. We present UpStory - the Uppsala Storytelling dataset: a novel dataset of naturalistic dyadic interactions between primary school aged children, with an experimental manipulation of rapport. Pairs of children aged 8-10 participate in a task-oriented activity: designing a story together, while being allowed free movement within the play area. We promote balanced collection of different levels of rapport by using a within-subjects design: self-reported friendships are used to pair each child twice, either minimizing or maximizing pair separation in the friendship network. The dataset contains data for 35 pairs, totaling 3 h 40 m of audiovisual recordings. It includes two video sources, and separate voice recordings per child. An anonymized version of the dataset is made publicly available, containing per-frame head pose, body pose, and face features. Finally, we confirm the informative power of the UpStory dataset by establishing baselines for the prediction of rapport. A simple approach achieves 68% test accuracy using data from one child, and 70% test accuracy aggregating data from a pair.

Indexed as

child-child interactionmachine learningmultimodal datasetrapportsocial signals

Identifiers

PMID40761769
PMCPMC12320241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.