Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761765›Full record

ReviewResuscitation plus2025

Basic life support training targeted to family members or carers of those at high-risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review.

Zakary Doherty, Janet E Bray, Judith Finn, Susie Cartledge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zakary DohertySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Janet E BraySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Judith FinnSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Susie CartledgeSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This updated systematic review examined the impact of targeting basic life support (BLS) training to groups at high risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) on patient and educational outcomes. Methods: Searches of databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library) were conducted from June 2014 to November 2024 (PROSPERO CRD42021233811). We identified pre-2014 studies from the 2015 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation evaluation of this topic. Two reviewers independently screened titles and full-text papers, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (ROB-2 and ROBINS-I). The certainty of the evidence for each outcome was evaluated using GRADE methodology. A narrative synthesis was performed. Results: A total of 48 studies (17 new non-randomised studies) were found. While there is evidence of subsequent use of skills and improved survival with the intervention, the quality of evidence remains very-low to low, due to the low number of OHCA events during follow-up and significant loss to follow-up. For educational outcomes, the quality of evidence for CPR skills, confidence and willingness to perform CPR was low to moderate, with most studies showing improvements in these outcomes or skills at guideline recommendations following training. Those trained were also likely to train others. Conclusions: Despite a large number of studies examining BLS training to those at high-risk of OHCA, the quality of evidence remained largely unchanged. However, the evidence continues to demonstrate that targeting those at high-risk improves simulated CPR skills, and confidence and willingness to provide CPR in likely rescuers.

Indexed as

Basic life supportCardiopulmonary resuscitationFamily membersHigh-risk personsOut of hospital cardiac arrestSystematic reviewTraining

Identifiers

PMID40761765
PMCPMC12320174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.