Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2025
Determining the 90% Effective Dose of Remimazolam to Prevent Physical Movement in Surgical Abortions: A Biased-Coin Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus Venturi facemask in women with cardiovascular disease undergoing cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Optimal Dosing Strategies for Remimazolam Across Diverse Patient Populations: A Clinical Narrative Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Remimazolam is widely employed in surgical abortions. However, its dosing references from clinical studies such as gastrointestinal and bronchoscopic anesthesia have resulted in high incidence of physical movement. Purpose: Determining the optimal dosage (the 90% effective dose [ED90]) for preventing physical movement during surgical abortions. Patients and Methods: Fifty-seven individuals aged 18 to 45 undergoing surgical abortion were included. Remimazolam, combined with remifentanil, was utilized for anesthesia induction. Commencing at an initial dose of 0.25 mg/kg of remimazolam, subsequent adjustments relied on the preceding patient's response, employing an up-down sequential allocation utilizing a biased-coin design. Results: Patients received remimazolam doses ranging from 0.25 to 0.65 mg/kg. The estimated ED90, along with its 95% confidence interval (CI), for preventing physical movement was 0.615 mg/kg (0.398-0.629 mg/kg). Patients maintained stable circulation, and no significant adverse events were recorded. Patients reported a satisfaction score of 4.63 ± 0.62 points. Anesthesiologists rated their satisfaction at 4.19 ± 0.61 points, and endoscopists expressed a satisfaction level of 4.53 ± 0.57 points (based on a full score of 5 points, with a minimum of 1 point). Conclusion: The ED90 of remimazolam during surgical abortion to prevent physical movement was determined to be 0.615 mg/kg (95% CI, 0.398-0.629 mg/kg).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.