ArticleERJ open research2025
Top 10 priorities for chronic cough: Canadian James Lind Alliance Priority-Setting Partnership (CAN-COUGH).
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic cough significantly impacts individuals' quality of life and poses challenges for healthcare providers due to limited licensed treatments, side effects of available medications and difficulty accessing nonpharmacological interventions. Understanding priorities for research, education and knowledge dissemination from the perspectives of individuals with chronic cough and healthcare providers can guide future efforts. This study aimed to identify these key priorities in Canada. Study design and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) method to set priorities. Chronic cough was identified as the healthcare problem. Participants rated items related to research, education and knowledge dissemination in an online survey using a seven-point Likert scale. Results of the survey were reviewed by the Canadian Thoracic Society's (CTS) multidisciplinary working group and patient partners who engaged in a face-to-face Priority-Setting Partnership, to establish a "Top 10" priorities list for chronic cough. Results: 74 individuals with chronic cough and 62 healthcare providers completed the scoping survey. The top-rated priorities included enhancing knowledge of existing treatments, developing new treatments and improving diagnostic testing. The final "Top 10" priorities list emphasised the need for developing infrastructure for evaluating new treatments, improving understanding of biological mechanisms and raising awareness among the public and policymakers. Conclusion: This is the first priority-setting project for chronic cough, highlighting key areas to address in research, education and dissemination. The identified priorities will serve as a foundation for future efforts to improve the management and care of individuals with chronic cough.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.