ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Microsurgical Foot Reconstruction in Children Affected by Lawn Mower Injury.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Lower Extremity Lawnmower Injuries Requiring Free Tissue Transfer.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Cut Short: Evaluation, Management, and Prevention of Pediatric Lawnmower-Related Injuries.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lawn mower injuries can cause limb-threatening wounds in the lower extremities of children. Although most cases require only basic wound treatment, a minority need microsurgical and orthopedic reconstruction for limb salvage. These procedures remain complex owing to small vessel diameter, increased vasospasticity, limited postoperative compliance, and continued growth in children. This case series demonstrated successful microsurgical foot reconstructions in a selected pediatric patient cohort. Methods: Three patients younger than 5 years underwent foot reconstruction after mower injury. Injury patterns included (1) Chopart-like forefoot amputation, (2) first toe amputation, and (3) amputation of metatarsals I and II with destruction of the third toe, each with respective soft tissue defects. One patient required hindfoot reconstruction and tendon transfers before microsurgery. Two patients received latissimus dorsi flaps, and 1 was treated with a gracilis muscle flap. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale. Results: Patients were aged 2, 3, and 5 years, with reconstruction performed 1-24 days postinjury. All 3 patients underwent successful microsurgical and orthopedic reconstruction with no major complications. All patients presented with preserved ability to walk and participate in sports, achieving Lower Extremity Functional Scale scores of 75-80 out of 80, even after a maximum follow-up of 20 years. Conclusions: Foot reconstructions after traumatic foot amputation in children are intricate procedures. Nonetheless, microvascular reconstruction is a feasible option for limb salvage in pediatric patients even at ages as young as 2 years. Interdisciplinary cooperation is essential to provide a comprehensive treatment concept and restore optimal functionality.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.