ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
An Updated Classification: Important Branching and Perforator Patterns in Robotic-assisted Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap surgery requires specific vascular anatomy for optimal flap harvest. Deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) branching patterns were described as follows: single trunk (type 1), bifurcation (type 2), trifurcation (type 3), and 4-branch (type 4) above the arcuate line. This study demonstrated an additional type 5 anatomy-double trunk at the takeoff from the external iliac artery-as well as an updated classification of DIEA dominant perforator patterns. The significance is described. Methods: A retrospective review of preoperative computed tomographic angiography and intraoperative anatomy of 50 patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction was performed. A total of 100 DIEAs and their branching and perforator patterns were analyzed. Results: Out of 100 DIEAs reviewed, there were 59, 34, 4, 1, and 2 classified as types 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Only 1 case with such anatomy contained a dominant perforator that would supply perfusion to the DIEP flap, meaning that in the other case, both arterial trunks were required. The perforator pattern was also described. Conclusions: DIEA branching and perforator patterns were introduced, including a rare variation in the DIEA's branching pattern: a double trunk. Importantly, one of these trunks might lack a dominant perforator. To minimize donor site complications and ensure adequate blood flow to the flap, it is crucial to identify this variation and the perforator anatomy using preoperative computed tomographic angiography. Ultimately, whether it involves both trunks or just 1, the correct perforator selection is key.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.