Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761606›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Cervical, Breast, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Among Sexual and Gender Minority Women in Japan: Using a Nationwide Online Survey.

Midori Matsushima, Junyi Wang, Tetsuji Minami, Hiroyuki Yamada, Naoki Kondo, Takahiro Tabuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Midori MatsushimaFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Ibaraki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7515-2709
Junyi WangGraduate School of Busines Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Ibaraki Japan.
Tetsuji MinamiInstitute for Cancer Control National Cancer Center Chuuo-ku Tokyo Japan.
Hiroyuki YamadaFaculty of Economics Keio University Minato-ku Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3709-1914
Naoki KondoDepartment of Social Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health Kyoto University Kyoto Kyoto Japan.
Takahiro TabuchiDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine Tohoku University Sendai Miyagi Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Owing to the high mortality rates associated with cervical and breast cancers, increasing screening uptake is a priority. However, the current policy lacks consideration for sexual and gender minorities (SGMs). This study aimed to examine whether SGM women have lower take-up rates of these female-organ-specific cancers than non-SGM women by investigating the difference in screening frequency between them. Additionally, colorectal cancer screening was used as another outcome to determine whether the results were unique to female-organ-specific cancers. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted using a nationwide online survey in 2023. Information from women aged 20-69 years was used, with a sample size of 12,305, including 1371 SGM and 10,934 non-SGM individuals. As an outcome variable, the careening take-up of cervical and breast cancers was used, sex-specific cancer and being screened in Obstetrics and Gynecology, colorectal cancer, which is non-sex specific, and the screening is conducted at home. Results: Considering demographic characteristics and socioeconomic status as constants, a lower likelihood of screening for cervical and breast cancer was observed in SGM women than in non-SGM women (odds ratio [OR] 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.88 for cervical cancer, and OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.93 for breast cancer). No difference was found between SGM and non-SGM women in colorectal cancer screening (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.80-1.16). Conclusion: This study highlights the sexual orientation and gender identity gap in the frequency of cervical and breast cancer screenings but not in colorectal cancer screenings. This study highlights the potential barriers faced by SGM women, emphasizing the importance of raising awareness of the unique healthcare challenges, particularly concerning female-organ-specific cancers.

Indexed as

cancer screeningJapansexual and gender minoritywomen

Identifiers

PMID40761606
PMCPMC12319235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.