ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Bridging the gap in mental health literacy: co-adapting and feasibility testing a digital intervention to improve mental health literacy amongst young people aged 12-14 in the UK.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital interventions have shown promise in enhancing mental health literacy among young people (YP). Initially developed in Indonesia, the Improving Mental Health Literacy Among Young People in Indonesia (IMPeTUs) intervention is a co-produced digital application designed to improve mental health literacy and self-management of anxiety and depression in YP. This study aimed to co-adapt the IMPeTUs intervention with YP in the UK and evaluate the feasibility of conducting a future definitive trial in education and community settings. Methods: The study consisted of two phases. Phase 1 involved co-adapting the intervention through consultations with 49 stakeholders, including YP, parents, and professionals, using principles of experience-based co-design. 'Co-adapting' and 'co-creating' refer to collaborative modification and development of intervention content with stakeholders. Then, Phase 2 was a multi-site, cluster-randomized feasibility trial with a nested mixed-methods process evaluation conducted at two community sites (N = 19, 12 completing 4-week post-intervention data and 11 completing 3-month follow-up). The 'nested process evaluation' assessed acceptability and engagement alongside the trial. Results: In Phase 1, the digital intervention was co-adapted with stakeholders to include expanded customization options, UK-specific content, and a new chapter on resilience, healthy relationships and self-care to improve engagement and support mental health literacy. Phase 2 showed the application was well-received, with YP appreciating its relatable storylines and problem-solving focus. Recruitment challenges and lengthy questionnaires highlighted the need for improved partnerships with schools and streamlined data collection. Despite these issues, the usability of the core design was validated, and recommendations to enhance engagement, such as reducing text and adding interactive features, were identified. Exploratory analyses suggested potential improvements in mental health literacy and well-being, although these results require confirmation in a well-powered trial. Conclusion: This study highlights the feasibility of co-adapting and implementing digital interventions to improve mental health literacy among YP within community settings. Future work should focus on refining recruitment strategies for school environments, streamlining data collection, and enhancing engagement features to ensure scalability and effectiveness in large-scale evaluations. These findings lay the foundation for further development and rigorous digital mental health literacy intervention assessment. Clinical trial registration: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16116467, identifier ISRCTN16116467.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.