Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761589›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Weight stigma and mental health in a racially and ethnically diverse sample of US adults.

Mary A Gerend, Anna W Lu, Elizabeth L Teets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary A GerendCollege of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Anna W LuCollege of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Elizabeth L TeetsCollege of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Weight stigma is associated with poor mental health outcomes. Yet little is known about whether the strength of the association between weight stigma and mental health outcomes differs by race or ethnicity, or factors that mitigate the mental health consequences of weight stigma. This study sought to address these research gaps. Methods: A large sample of US adults (N = 2,632; aged 18-64 years; 50% women) completed an online survey. Quota sampling ensured that over two-thirds of respondents self-identified as Black/African American or Hispanic/Latino. Our primary predictors were experienced and internalized weight stigma. Primary outcomes included global mental health, depression severity, and history of diagnosis with a depressive disorder. Linear and logistic multivariable regression analyses tested whether the association between weight stigma and mental health outcomes was moderated by (1) race or ethnicity, and (2) frequency of using adaptive coping strategies to manage weight stigma-related stress (e.g., cognitive reframing, seeking social support). Results: Both experienced and internalized weight stigma were associated with worse mental health (i.e., lower global mental health scores, more frequent depressive symptoms in the past two weeks, greater odds of depressive disorder diagnosis) and effects held while controlling for body mass index and sociodemographic characteristics. Further, the strength of the association between weight stigma and mental health outcomes was equivalent among Black and non-Black participants and among Latino and non-Latino participants. Adaptive coping was a significant moderator for global mental health and depressive disorder diagnosis but not depression severity such that the weight stigma-mental health relationship was weakest among respondents who engaged in adaptive coping strategies more frequently. Discussion: Adults with more frequent exposure to interpersonal weight stigma and higher levels of internalized weight bias reported poorer mental health status. Notably, the strength of these associations was similar regardless of racial or ethnic identity suggesting no group is protected from the detrimental health effects associated with weight stigma. Individuals who respond to weight stigma with adaptive coping strategies may be more protected from adverse psychological outcomes. Findings have important implications for initiatives aimed at reducing harm to mental health that may be associated with weight stigma.

Indexed as

adaptive coping strategiesdepressiondepressive symptomsglobal mental healthinternalized weight biasperceived weight discriminationweight stigma

Identifiers

PMID40761589
PMCPMC12319583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.