ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
DLML-PC: an automated deep learning and metric learning approach for precise soybean pod classification and counting in intact plants.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensor-Centric Intelligent Systems for Soybean Harvest Mechanization in Challenging Agro-Environments of China: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pod numbers are important for assessing soybean yield. How to simplify the traditional manual process and determine the pod number phenotype of soybean maturity more quickly and accurately is an urgent challenge for breeders. With the development of smart agriculture, numerous scientists have explored the phenotypic information related to soybean pod number and proposed corresponding methods. However, these methods mainly focus on the total number of pods, ignoring the differences between different pod types and do not consider the time-consuming and labor-intensive problem of picking pods from the whole plant. In this study, a deep learning approach was used to directly detect the number of different types of pods on non-disassembled plants at the maturity stage of soybean. Subsequently, the number of pods wascorrected by means of a metric learning method, thereby improving the accuracy of counting different types of pods. After 200 epochs, the recognition results of various object detection algorithms were compared to obtain the optimal model. Among the algorithms, YOLOX exhibited the highest mean average precision (mAP) of 83.43% in accurately determining the counts of diverse pod categories within soybean plants. By improving the Siamese Network in metric learning, the optimal Siamese Network model was obtained. SE-ResNet50 was used as the feature extraction network, and its accuracy on the test set reached 93.7%. Through the Siamese Network model, the results of object detection were further corrected and counted. The correlation coefficients between the number of one-seed pods, the number of two-seed pods, the number of three-seed pods, the number of four-seed pods and the total number of pods extracted by the algorithm and the manual measurement results were 92.62%, 95.17%, 96.90%, 94.93%, 96.64%,respectively. Compared with the object detection algorithm, the recognition of soybean mature pods was greatly improved, evolving into a high-throughput and universally applicable method. The described results show that the proposed method is a robust measurement and counting algorithm, which can reduce labor intensity, improve efficiency and accelerate the process of soybean breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.