Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761544›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Modern experimental methods for assessing the effectiveness of tissue-engineered products for hyaline cartilage regeneration.

M S Bozhokin, Yu S Korneva, S A Bozhkova, E R Mikhaylova, D M Marchenko, B R Rakhimov, Y A Nashchekina, M G Khotin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M S BozhokinCenter of Cell Technologies, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Yu S KornevaCentre of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Department of Wound Infection, Vreden National Medical Research, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
S A BozhkovaCentre of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Department of Wound Infection, Vreden National Medical Research, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
E R MikhaylovaCenter of Cell Technologies, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
D M MarchenkoCenter of Cell Technologies, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
B R RakhimovCenter of Cell Technologies, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Y A NashchekinaCenter of Cell Technologies, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
M G KhotinCenter of Cell Technologies, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyaline cartilage (HC) is a specialized connective tissue that covers the surfaces of major joints and is characterized by its limited regenerative capacity. Modern therapeutic approaches to HC restoration often do not provide complete regeneration of damaged tissue. Developed tissue engineering methods show promise as effective approaches for restoring various types of HC damage. Due to the rapid evolution of various technologies in research practice, the range of methods available for analysis of TE constructs has expanded, including for the study of tissue engineering of hyaline cartilage (TEHC). Because of the complexity of the HC's structure, a whole range of methods is needed to assess characteristics of the scaffold, such as structure and strength. It is also important to study the behavior of cells inside the TE construct at all stages of cultivation, including post transplantation into the damaged area. The opacity of the scaffold and the complexity of its architecture often cause issues with the cell visualization and assessment of their viability. Therefore, there is a need to optimize each specific method for each specific scaffold. Despite the active study of TEHC, the results remain unsatisfactory. In this study, we have systematized data on the effectiveness and feasibility of methods to analyze structure, mechanical characteristics, cell interaction with the scaffold, and their ability to form new tissue before and after transplantation.

Indexed as

hyaline cartilagemethodsrecoveryreviewtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40761544
PMCPMC12318997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.